The Accidental Salesman brand markThe Accidental Salesman

Evidence & experiments · Essay 058

Keep a record of what did not work

The Accidental Salesman Editorial Desk · 2 min read · Published 15 October 2026

Whiteboard illustration of evidence & experiments

Successful examples travel easily. Failed attempts remain in private notes or disappear when the next initiative begins. The resulting knowledge base can make selling look more predictable than it is.

A failure record should be factual and useful. What was attempted? Why did it seem reasonable? What happened? What remains uncertain? Avoid turning it into a blame document or an entertaining story about a difficult buyer.

Separate execution failure from a weak idea. An outreach test with inaccurate contact data does not fairly evaluate the message. A well-executed offer that repeatedly attracts unsuitable buyers may reveal a problem with positioning. The corrective action differs.

Record changes made during the test. If the team revised the audience, message and price halfway through, the final result belongs to a changing intervention. That does not make the work worthless, but it limits what can be attributed to any one element.

Sharing failures internally can save repeated effort. Publishing selected failures can also strengthen a publication if the account is specific, consented and proportionate. Readers need to understand the conditions, not merely be told that a fashionable tactic failed.

The discipline is to preserve knowledge before the emotional reaction fades. A short review completed promptly is more reliable than a confident explanation reconstructed months later after the outcome has become familiar.

Put it to work

A practical next step

Add a "what we would not repeat" field to project and campaign reviews. Require a supporting observation and a boundary condition so the lesson does not become an overgeneralised prohibition.

Proposed practice, not a completed experiment. Illustrations are not client testimony.

Sources & limits

This essay is editorial interpretation from the supplied manuscript, not an empirical research report. No external study is cited for its recommendations.

Source: The work of winning trust, editorial review edition, 15 October 2026, p. 72. No publication history is inferred from its sequence dates.