The Accidental Salesman brand markThe Accidental Salesman

Evidence & experiments · Essay 092

The denominator can change the story

The Accidental Salesman Editorial Desk · 2 min read · Published 15 October 2026

Whiteboard illustration of evidence & experiments

A conversion rate looks simple until you ask what was counted. Wins divided by all enquiries tells a different story from wins divided by qualified opportunities. Both can be valid, but they answer different questions.

Define the population before comparing periods or teams. If qualification becomes stricter, proposal conversion may rise even when the number of clients won is unchanged. That can still be an improvement if less effort is wasted, but the reason should be understood.

Track movement between stages with consistent rules. A record should enter a stage because a defined condition is met, not because someone wants the pipeline to look healthier. Otherwise the numbers reflect administrative habits as much as commercial performance.

Include time. A recent group of opportunities may not have had enough time to close. Comparing its conversion with a mature group can make performance appear worse simply because outcomes are incomplete.

Report counts beside percentages, especially for small firms. One additional win can create a dramatic percentage change when only a few proposals were issued. The reader needs the denominator to judge the significance.

The objective is not to find the most flattering definition. It is to use a stable definition that helps identify where the business improves or struggles. When the definition changes, document the change rather than quietly joining incompatible numbers in one chart.

Put it to work

A practical next step

Audit one dashboard metric from source records to final percentage. Write its numerator, denominator, time window and exclusion rules beside the chart. Check whether recent and mature opportunities are being mixed.

Proposed practice, not a completed experiment. Illustrations are not client testimony.

Sources & limits

This essay is editorial interpretation from the supplied manuscript, not an empirical research report. No external study is cited for its recommendations.

Source: The work of winning trust, editorial review edition, 15 October 2026, p. 110. No publication history is inferred from its sequence dates.